Artwriting : A Response  The Brooklyn Rail
Advertisement Space

The Blurred Lines Between Art Criticism and Art History

The Overlap of Disciplines

Art criticism and art history are often viewed as distinct disciplines, but they share a common goal: to evaluate the critical worth of artworks. Both art critics and art historians engage in critical analysis, but their approaches differ in terms of methodology and focus. • Art criticism tends to focus on the present and the immediate, often responding to a new work’s release or exhibition. • Art history, on the other hand, takes a more retrospective approach, examining the development of art movements, styles, and techniques over time.

  • The artist’s intentions and biography
  • The cultural and social climate of the time
  • The artistic movements and styles that influenced the work
  • The exhibition or publication in which the work was presented
  • The Impact of Contemporary Art on Art History

    The increasing attention to contemporary art has blurred the lines between art criticism and art history.

    The Interdisciplinary Nature of Artwriting

    Artwriting is not limited to art criticism and art history. It can be applied to various fields, including history, literature, and even science.

  • Descriptive writing: providing a detailed description of artworks and their visual elements.
  • Analytical writing: examining the symbolism, iconography, and other visual elements of artworks.
  • Interpretive writing: drawing conclusions about the meaning and significance of artworks.The Role of Artwriting in Literature
  • In literature, artwriting is often used to describe the visual elements of literary works, such as illustrations, typography, and layout. Literary critics may use artwriting to analyze the visual elements of a book or article to gain a deeper understanding of the author’s message.